The patient a child, who was brought to the emergency room (ER) by his mother on 09/24/16 with complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Initial abdominal X-rays did not show any evidence of obstruction, leading Dr. David Miller to diagnose the issue as constipation and excess stool. However, a subsequent CT scan on 09/25/16 revealed a non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop, suggesting a possible adhesion. During surgery, Dr. Miller identified and corrected an adhesion in the intestine, but despite initial improvement, the patient suffered a second acute event, underwent further surgery, and ultimately died from sepsis.
The plaintiffs in the case allege that Dr. Miller failed to adequately intervene on the initial visit, did not order a CT scan timely, and misdiagnosed the patient's condition as constipation despite a history of previous bowel obstruction. They suggest that these failures contributed to the patient's death. In contrast, the defense asserts that Dr. Miller met the standard of care, arguing that the initial X-rays did not indicate a need for immediate surgical intervention and that the diagnosis of constipation was reasonable based on the available radiographic evidence. They also note that the volvulus from an adhesion, found during surgery, was not apparent from the initial radiographic studies, implying that earlier intervention was not clearly indicated by the diagnostic tests.
Department File Number : | M201887046 |
Claim Number : | CLW0002066 |
Date Submitted : | 11/16/2018 |
Insurer Information | |||||
Insurer Name | Coverage Type | ||||
NORCAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY | Primary | ||||
Insurer FEIN | Professional License Number | ||||
94-2301054 | |||||
Insurer Contact Information | |||||
Type | First Name | MI | Last Name | ||
Individual | Richard | Petersen | |||
Street Address | |||||
4651 Salisbury Rd. #410 | |||||
City | State | Zip | |||
Jacksonville | FL | 32256 | |||
Phone | Ext | Fax | E-Mail Address | ||
(904) 309 - 8142 | (904) 394 - 7134 | rpetersen@norcal-group.com |
Insured Information | |||||
Type | First Name | MI | Last Name | ||
Individual | David | Miller | |||
Insurer Type | Street Address of Practice | ||||
Licensed | 1720 S Orange Avenue | ||||
City | State | Zip Code | County | ||
Orlando | FL | 32806 | Orange | ||
Policy Number | Per Claim Policy Limits | Aggregate Policy Limits | |||
722475N | $250,000 | $750,000 | |||
Profession or Business | Other Profession or Business | ||||
Medical Doctor | |||||
License Number | Specialty Code & Classification | Certification Number | |||
ME40941 | Surgery - Orthopedic |
Injured Person Information | |||||
First Name | MI | Last Name | Date of Birth | ||
Street Address | Gender | County where Injury Occurred | |||
M | Orange | ||||
City | State | Zip Code | |||
Location where injury occured | Other location where injury occured | ||||
Hospital Inpatient Facility | |||||
Name of Institution | Code | ||||
ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL | 120001 | ||||
Location of Institutional Injury | Other Location of Institutional Injury | ||||
Operating Suite | |||||
Date of Occurrence | Date Reported to Insurer | ||||
9/24/2016 | 7/19/2018 |
Diagnostic Information | |||||
Final Diagnosis For Which Treatment Was Sought Including Patient's Actual Condition | |||||
On or about 09/24/16, the patient was taken to the ER by his mother w complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal X-rays showed no evidence for dilated small bowel or free air. Dr. David Miller was consulted & he noted no surgical concern supported by radiographic studies did not show an obstruction. At that time, the thought was that the child suffered from excess stool and constipation.Early the next morning on 09/25/16, a CT of the abdomen showed non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop across the left upper abdomen may reflect air in the transverse colon, no other free air on this limited supine view. The patient was transported to the OR where Dr. Miller noted an "adhesion to the intestine." Dr. Miller corrected the problem and noted that the child's lab values had improved. Dr. Miller intended to leave the surgery site open for 12-24 hours and take a 2nd observation when a second acute event occurred. Dr. Miller attempted additional surgery when Emmanuel expired. An autopsy was performed with the cause of death "sepsis."The plaintiffs allege that Dr. Miller failed to intervene on 09/24/16, failed to order a CT Scan, and made a faulty diagnosis of "constipation" in light of the history of previous bowel obstruction.However, the defense standard of expert found that Dr. Miller met the standard of care and opined that the x-ray did not show air fluid levels and suggested constipation. In retrospect, the child was found to have a volvulus from an adhesion but disagreed with Plaintiffs" contention that anything from the radiographic studies suggested that there should have been earlier intervention. | |||||
Operation, Diagnostic, Or Treatment Procedure Rendered Causing The Injury | |||||
On or about 09/24/16, the patient was taken to the ER by his mother w complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal X-rays showed no evidence for dilated small bowel or free air. Dr. David Miller was consulted & he noted no surgical concern supported by radiographic studies did not show an obstruction. At that time, the thought was that the child suffered from excess stool and constipation.Early the next morning on 09/25/16, a CT of the abdomen showed non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop across the left upper abdomen may reflect air in the transverse colon, no other free air on this limited supine view. The patient was transported to the OR where Dr. Miller noted an "adhesion to the intestine." Dr. Miller corrected the problem and noted that the child's lab values had improved. Dr. Miller intended to leave the surgery site open for 12-24 hours and take a 2nd observation when a second acute event occurred. Dr. Miller attempted additional surgery when Emmanuel expired. An autopsy was performed with the cause of death "sepsis."The plaintiffs allege that Dr. Miller failed to intervene on 09/24/16, failed to order a CT Scan, and made a faulty diagnosis of "constipation" in light of the history of previous bowel obstruction.However, the defense standard of expert found that Dr. Miller met the standard of care and opined that the x-ray did not show air fluid levels and suggested constipation. In retrospect, the child was found to have a volvulus from an adhesion but disagreed with Plaintiffs" contention that anything from the radiographic studies suggested that there should have been earlier intervention. | |||||
Diagnostic Code : | |||||
Misdiagnosis Made, If Any, Of Patient's Actual Condition | |||||
*NR | |||||
Principal Injury Giving Rise To The Claim | |||||
On or about 09/24/16, the patient was taken to the ER by his mother w complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal X-rays showed no evidence for dilated small bowel or free air. Dr. David Miller was consulted & he noted no surgical concern supported by radiographic studies did not show an obstruction. At that time, the thought was that the child suffered from excess stool and constipation.Early the next morning on 09/25/16, a CT of the abdomen showed non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop across the left upper abdomen may reflect air in the transverse colon, no other free air on this limited supine view. The patient was transported to the OR where Dr. Miller noted an "adhesion to the intestine." Dr. Miller corrected the problem and noted that the child's lab values had improved. Dr. Miller intended to leave the surgery site open for 12-24 hours and take a 2nd observation when a second acute event occurred. Dr. Miller attempted additional surgery when Emmanuel expired. An autopsy was performed with the cause of death "sepsis."The plaintiffs allege that Dr. Miller failed to intervene on 09/24/16, failed to order a CT Scan, and made a faulty diagnosis of "constipation" in light of the history of previous bowel obstruction.However, the defense standard of expert found that Dr. Miller met the standard of care and opined that the x-ray did not show air fluid levels and suggested constipation. In retrospect, the child was found to have a volvulus from an adhesion but disagreed with Plaintiffs" contention that anything from the radiographic studies suggested that there should have been earlier intervention. | |||||
Severity Of Injury | |||||
Permanent: Death. |
Legal Information | |||||
Date of Suit | Circuit Court Case Number | ||||
*NR | |||||
County Suit Filed in | Date of Final Disposition | ||||
*NR | 11/16/2018 | ||||
Other Defendants Involved in this Claim | |||||
Stage of Legal System at which Settlement was Reached or Award Made | |||||
Within the pre-suit period as set forth in 766.106 (more than 90 days before suit is filed). | |||||
Final Method of Claim Disposition | |||||
Settled by parties | |||||
Court Decision | Other | ||||
No Court Proceedings. | |||||
Arbitration | |||||
Claim not subject to Arbitration. | |||||
Date of Payment | |||||
11/5/2018 |
Financial Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
Was there a settlement Resulting in payment to the Plaintiff? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indemnity Paid by Insurer on behalf of Insured | $200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss Adjust Expense Paid to Defense Counsel | $10,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||
All Other Loss Adjustment Expense Paid | $0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Injured Person's Total Non-Economic Loss | $0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deductible | $0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Injured Person's Total Economic Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Safety Management Steps Taken by Insured to Make Similar Occurrence Less Likely | |||||||||||||||||||||
The facts of the claim were discussed with the insured and risk management. |
Updates | |
No updates found. |
*NR: Prior to 04/28/1999 this field was not required in submitted claims. This page is not displaying certain sensitive information.
Does Dr. DAVID MILLER, MD have any medical malpractice cases, lawsuits, or complaints?
Dr. DAVID MILLER, MD has at least 1 medical malpractice case(s), lawsuit(s), or complaint(s).