Medical Malpractice Cases

Dr. DAVID MILLER, MD Medical Malpractice Cases, Lawsuits, and Complaints

Add Your Comments
Phycicians Practice Address
Dr. DAVID MILLER, MD
1720 S Orange Avenue
US

Summary

This case involves Dr. David Miller, MD, and describes a medical malpractice case where a $200,000 indemnity was paid due to a claim involving the death of a patient after surgery. The patient, initially presenting with abdominal pain and vomiting, was misdiagnosed with constipation despite a history of bowel obstruction. A later CT scan revealed a non-obstructive bowel gas pattern, leading to surgery where an adhesion was found. Despite surgical intervention, the patient died of sepsis. The defense argued Dr. Miller met the standard of care, but a settlement was reached pre-suit.

The patient a child, who was brought to the emergency room (ER) by his mother on 09/24/16 with complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Initial abdominal X-rays did not show any evidence of obstruction, leading Dr. David Miller to diagnose the issue as constipation and excess stool. However, a subsequent CT scan on 09/25/16 revealed a non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop, suggesting a possible adhesion. During surgery, Dr. Miller identified and corrected an adhesion in the intestine, but despite initial improvement, the patient suffered a second acute event, underwent further surgery, and ultimately died from sepsis.

The plaintiffs in the case allege that Dr. Miller failed to adequately intervene on the initial visit, did not order a CT scan timely, and misdiagnosed the patient's condition as constipation despite a history of previous bowel obstruction. They suggest that these failures contributed to the patient's death. In contrast, the defense asserts that Dr. Miller met the standard of care, arguing that the initial X-rays did not indicate a need for immediate surgical intervention and that the diagnosis of constipation was reasonable based on the available radiographic evidence. They also note that the volvulus from an adhesion, found during surgery, was not apparent from the initial radiographic studies, implying that earlier intervention was not clearly indicated by the diagnostic tests.

Court Case #

Indemnity Paid: $200,000.00

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation
Medical Malpractice Closed Claims Report
 
Department File Number :M201887046
Claim Number :CLW0002066
Date Submitted :11/16/2018
 
Insurer Information
 
Insurer NameCoverage Type
NORCAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYPrimary
Insurer FEINProfessional License Number
94-2301054 
Insurer Contact Information
TypeFirst NameMILast Name
IndividualRichard Petersen
Street Address
4651 Salisbury Rd. #410
CityStateZip
JacksonvilleFL32256
PhoneExtFaxE-Mail Address
(904) 309 - 8142 (904) 394 - 7134rpetersen@norcal-group.com
 
Insured Information
 
TypeFirst NameMILast Name
IndividualDavid Miller
Insurer TypeStreet Address of Practice
Licensed1720 S Orange Avenue
CityStateZip CodeCounty
OrlandoFL32806Orange
Policy NumberPer Claim Policy LimitsAggregate Policy Limits
722475N$250,000$750,000
Profession or BusinessOther Profession or Business
Medical Doctor 
License NumberSpecialty Code & ClassificationCertification Number
ME40941Surgery - Orthopedic 

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation
Medical Malpractice Closed Claims Report

 
 
Injured Person Information
 
First NameMILast NameDate of Birth
    
Street AddressGenderCounty where Injury Occurred
 MOrange
CityStateZip Code
   
Location where injury occuredOther location where injury occured
Hospital Inpatient Facility 
Name of InstitutionCode
ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL120001
Location of Institutional InjuryOther Location of Institutional Injury
Operating Suite 
Date of OccurrenceDate Reported to Insurer
9/24/20167/19/2018
 
Diagnostic Information
 
Final Diagnosis For Which Treatment Was Sought Including Patient's Actual Condition
On or about 09/24/16, the patient was taken to the ER by his mother w complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal X-rays showed no evidence for dilated small bowel or free air. Dr. David Miller was consulted & he noted no surgical concern supported by radiographic studies did not show an obstruction. At that time, the thought was that the child suffered from excess stool and constipation.Early the next morning on 09/25/16, a CT of the abdomen showed non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop across the left upper abdomen may reflect air in the transverse colon, no other free air on this limited supine view. The patient was transported to the OR where Dr. Miller noted an "adhesion to the intestine." Dr. Miller corrected the problem and noted that the child's lab values had improved. Dr. Miller intended to leave the surgery site open for 12-24 hours and take a 2nd observation when a second acute event occurred. Dr. Miller attempted additional surgery when Emmanuel expired. An autopsy was performed with the cause of death "sepsis."The plaintiffs allege that Dr. Miller failed to intervene on 09/24/16, failed to order a CT Scan, and made a faulty diagnosis of "constipation" in light of the history of previous bowel obstruction.However, the defense standard of expert found that Dr. Miller met the standard of care and opined that the x-ray did not show air fluid levels and suggested constipation. In retrospect, the child was found to have a volvulus from an adhesion but disagreed with Plaintiffs" contention that anything from the radiographic studies suggested that there should have been earlier intervention.
Operation, Diagnostic, Or Treatment Procedure Rendered Causing The Injury
On or about 09/24/16, the patient was taken to the ER by his mother w complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal X-rays showed no evidence for dilated small bowel or free air. Dr. David Miller was consulted & he noted no surgical concern supported by radiographic studies did not show an obstruction. At that time, the thought was that the child suffered from excess stool and constipation.Early the next morning on 09/25/16, a CT of the abdomen showed non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop across the left upper abdomen may reflect air in the transverse colon, no other free air on this limited supine view. The patient was transported to the OR where Dr. Miller noted an "adhesion to the intestine." Dr. Miller corrected the problem and noted that the child's lab values had improved. Dr. Miller intended to leave the surgery site open for 12-24 hours and take a 2nd observation when a second acute event occurred. Dr. Miller attempted additional surgery when Emmanuel expired. An autopsy was performed with the cause of death "sepsis."The plaintiffs allege that Dr. Miller failed to intervene on 09/24/16, failed to order a CT Scan, and made a faulty diagnosis of "constipation" in light of the history of previous bowel obstruction.However, the defense standard of expert found that Dr. Miller met the standard of care and opined that the x-ray did not show air fluid levels and suggested constipation. In retrospect, the child was found to have a volvulus from an adhesion but disagreed with Plaintiffs" contention that anything from the radiographic studies suggested that there should have been earlier intervention.
Diagnostic Code : 
Misdiagnosis Made, If Any, Of Patient's Actual Condition
*NR
Principal Injury Giving Rise To The Claim
On or about 09/24/16, the patient was taken to the ER by his mother w complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal X-rays showed no evidence for dilated small bowel or free air. Dr. David Miller was consulted & he noted no surgical concern supported by radiographic studies did not show an obstruction. At that time, the thought was that the child suffered from excess stool and constipation.Early the next morning on 09/25/16, a CT of the abdomen showed non-obstructive bowel gas pattern and a distended bowel loop across the left upper abdomen may reflect air in the transverse colon, no other free air on this limited supine view. The patient was transported to the OR where Dr. Miller noted an "adhesion to the intestine." Dr. Miller corrected the problem and noted that the child's lab values had improved. Dr. Miller intended to leave the surgery site open for 12-24 hours and take a 2nd observation when a second acute event occurred. Dr. Miller attempted additional surgery when Emmanuel expired. An autopsy was performed with the cause of death "sepsis."The plaintiffs allege that Dr. Miller failed to intervene on 09/24/16, failed to order a CT Scan, and made a faulty diagnosis of "constipation" in light of the history of previous bowel obstruction.However, the defense standard of expert found that Dr. Miller met the standard of care and opined that the x-ray did not show air fluid levels and suggested constipation. In retrospect, the child was found to have a volvulus from an adhesion but disagreed with Plaintiffs" contention that anything from the radiographic studies suggested that there should have been earlier intervention.
Severity Of Injury
Permanent: Death.

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation
Medical Malpractice Closed Claims Report

 

Legal Information
 
Date of SuitCircuit Court Case Number
 *NR
County Suit Filed inDate of Final Disposition
*NR11/16/2018
Other Defendants Involved in this Claim
 
Stage of Legal System at which Settlement was Reached or Award Made
Within the pre-suit period as set forth in 766.106 (more than 90 days before suit is filed).
Final Method of Claim Disposition
Settled by parties
Court DecisionOther
No Court Proceedings. 
Arbitration
Claim not subject to Arbitration.
Date of Payment
11/5/2018
 
Financial Information
 
Was there a settlement Resulting in payment to the Plaintiff?Yes
Indemnity Paid by Insurer on behalf of Insured$200,000
Loss Adjust Expense Paid to Defense Counsel$10,618
All Other Loss Adjustment Expense Paid$0
Injured Person's Total Non-Economic Loss$0
Deductible$0
Injured Person's Total Economic Loss
 Incurred to DateAnticipated
Medical Expense$0$0
Wage Loss$0$0
Other Expenses$0$0
Safety Management Steps Taken by Insured to Make Similar Occurrence Less Likely
The facts of the claim were discussed with the insured and risk management.
 
Updates
 
No updates found.

 

 

*NR: Prior to 04/28/1999 this field was not required in submitted claims.

This page is not displaying certain sensitive information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Dr. DAVID MILLER, MD have any medical malpractice cases, lawsuits, or complaints?

Dr. DAVID MILLER, MD has at least 1 medical malpractice case(s), lawsuit(s), or complaint(s).